Go with the flow?

No Gravatar

Yesterday, we spoke about DBS (deep brain stimulation).  Today, we’ll talk about a different kind of brain stimulation- tCDS (trans-cranial direct current stimulation).  The goal of tCDS is to develop a feeling of “effortless” concentration, associated with outstanding performance.  This feeling is called the “flow” in the vernacular.  Before you decide to “go with the flow”, you have to understand that we don’t quite have it “nailed down”, either.

We do know (thanks to Dr. Anders Ericsson, Florida State University) that it takes about 10,000 hours of practice to become an expert in most disciplines.  This lets the brain develop the circuitry to perform these skills automatically, without having you consider each step in the process.  And, that process is what we call the ‘flow’.  Intense concentration, yet calm demeanor, with time seemingly slowing down- that’s the concept. And, some folks are able to develop the ‘flow’ earlier in their training, perhaps due to innate natural ability.

This has been the center of the efforts of Dr. Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi (then at Chicago, now Claremont Graduate University)  since the  1970’s, where he began describing this state empirically in his book, “Beyond Boredom and Anxiety”.)  He found that those joyful feelings in the flow state made further practice acceptable; in younger folks (like children), if they didn’t have that feeling of ‘flow’- in spite of their talents- they would stop developing those skills and become mediocre.

Csikszentmhalyi characterized the four essential features of ‘flow’: Absorption, autotelicity, the sweet spot, and automaticity.  Absorption is the intense immersion and focus that affords the user to lose all sense of time.  Autotelicity affords one the belief that the activity is the reward itself.  Finding the sweet spot means one feels that one is perfectly attuned to the task, so one is not bored or frustrated (being in the sweet spot)Automaticity is that feeling that things are happening by themselves.   (To be honest, this is how I feel when I am developing new products and processes- be they medical devices or business processes.  I just never heard the concept so described.)

You should note that I said that Csikszentmihalyi described the flow empirically.  Because we have not yet found the scientific measurements to ascertain this ‘nirvana’.  Csikszentmihalyi tried to do so using EEG (electroencephalography), where he found less activity in the prefrontal context, which is that area of the brain involved in working memory and verbalization.  He conjectured that this meant the subjects were silencing their self-critical thoughts, affording automaticity to take precedence.

Gabrielle Wulf (now at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas), in conjunction with Hoss and Prinz (then all at the Max Planck Institute), found that if athletes would focus their attention on an external point, one away from their body, they could augment their performance dramatically.  (This article is not universally available online; here is an abstract.)  This is in concert with the ‘flow’; skill acquisition that is greatly enhanced when conscious thought is sublimated.

Which is what tCDS is all about.  With a small power supply and transmitter, an anode (positive) is affixed to one’s temple, and the cathode (negative) is attached to one’s left arm, or both leads could be connected to one’s temple.  One feels a tingle as the 2 milliamp current is used to stimulate the ‘object recognition’ center of the brain. It supposedly makes the neurons in the region more responsive to inputs (more excitable) by depolarizing the neuron’s membranes, and lets new neural pathways form more readily when learning the new skills.  (Should you elect to pull the electrodes at an inopportune time, you could be rendered blind- for more than a few seconds…)

We don’t know if those brain reactions are true yet.  But, we do know is that our sense of time is disrupted- where we think the elapsed time to have been much shorter.  And our responses are, indeed, more automatic, with focused efforts and calmed feelings.  In other words, our performances are indeed automatic.  The other fact we do know is that this type of process is being tested by the military. To improve the performance of snipers and special forces.

While this seems to improve our performance, ranging from STEM (science, technology, engineering, and math) to marksmanship, it’s NOT something to be tried at home.  Oh, there are kits and underground efforts.  But, tCDS systems are normally a few thousand dollars, at least the ones with quality control involved.  Remember, you can find yourself blind, if you are not careful.

Roy A. Ackerman, Ph.D., E.A.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter
Share

10 thoughts on “Go with the flow?”

  1. I think I may have something to add to this! LOL My father taught me martial arts when I was growing up, and this “flow” you describe (at least how I interpret it) is what he taught me to try to attain. He used the example of, sitting at your desk, seeing your pencil start to fall, and catching it before you think about it. (I hope I explained that accurately enough.) He was explaining this in relationship to reflexes, but then went on to say that it is applies to nearly everything you do. Personally, I have applied this to my artistic work, and find especially in my etching work since it is an unforgiving medium that doesn’t allow for correction of mistakes, that the less I “think” and the more I just “do” the better my pieces turn out. So, I guess my addition is this: perhaps in the experiments they should use a group of people who are either training or in training to do that flow thing and measure their brain waves as they accomplish the tasks to get a better picture of how to achieve it with the STEM?

    1. Lisa, that is among the testing they are doing. They’ve also done testing (fMRI) of folks who are meditating. That last research is coming out in drips and drabs- not in a definitive article.
      Many folks who engage in creative thought and action find the “flow” to be where they want to be…

      Roy

  2. Roy, I have been there before. I have just never had a name for it. But time does a funny thing to me. I’m not sure you would call it slowing down, however. I will be working on something and suddenly realize I have been working on it for a bunch of hours and have lost all track of time. Cool info. Thanks.
    Ann recently posted..Asking the Hard Questions or Not Asking–A Case Study

  3. What an interesting post. In my yoga class, we always focus on a point on the wall when doing some poses, which makes it easier to hold them by diverting our thoughts away from the experience. I have experienced that process learning how to drive a stick shift car later in life. Eventually you don’t think about stalling the car or grinding the gears and then you don’t really think about driving at all…
    Kristen recently posted..Dealing With Financial Stress

  4. Hi Roy,
    On what region of the brain does this operate? Any chance it works on the anterior cingulate cortex? (I’m thinking of today’s news about the part of the brain which affects hoarding.)

    1. This system is very new, Caroline. And, the cingulate cortex is in the interior portion of the brain, which is somewhat deeper than that the regions where these transcranial tests have been effected. So, I don’t really have an answer about this yet. This may apply or not- but no one has examined its effect upon the hoarding situation.

      Roy

  5. Roy,
    Where does the information about being blinded come from? I know that a sudden change in current near the eyes can cause a phosphene with TCDS, but this is the only article I have seen about blindness. Is this from a study, or a warning to practitioners who conduct their experiments above the safe mA range, or something else?

    1. Mr. Beverly:
      Those results did not come about when the process was employed by trained professionals, but when “hobbyists” were involved and often via self-prescription. There have been several publications on that. It is why I said, basically, don’t try this at home- to insure that there were folks around to insure that premature termination and/or improper dosage not be effected. There are great hopes that this will be most useful when effected under controlled conditions- and, perhaps, when the systems become more engineered to afford more genreal use in less stringent conditions.
      i hope that answers your question.

Comments are closed.