No more brown bagging it…

No Gravatar

The end of an era.  No, I am not talking about sentient beings in politics.  Although…

For most of my life, there was a monthly event that titillated young boys.  And, I am sure it excited  some that failed to grow up.  Starting with its “inventor” – Hugh Hefner.

Anyone over the age of 30 will recall the hedonistic parties that “Hef” provided.  Replete with nubile young women.  Supposedly, his goal was to promote his magazine- Playboy. But, he certainly managed to live the lifestyle he desired.

Each month, three pictorial “essays” were published revolving about voluptuous women.  Oh, and let’s not forget the “important” interview that was the center of each issue.  You know, to justify the fact that men were “educating” themselves.  Yup.  Education was the goal.

Inaugural Playboy Issue
First Playboy Ever

From its debut in 1953 for 20 years, Playboy was the undisputed young boy (and men) titillation. Many a parent had to admonish their young boys when they found the magazine hidden under the bed, hidden between the frame and the mattress, or jammed into the back of a drawer.  Because the photos were considered unseemly.

(I admit to having seen a few issues.  But, to be honest, I found it far more interesting to read the anatomy and biology texts that were kept in boxes in the basement of our house.  You know, the place where my chem lab was “headquartered”.  [Actually, these were kept on the other side of the basement, near the Lionel train set that provided me hours of enjoyment.].

And, while I’m at it.  My fraternity induction was held at the Manhattan Playboy club.  I obviously missed the idea, since I brought my girlfriend to the event- and my fraternity brothers thought that was the funniest move of all.)

And, once the sexual revolution reached the hinterlands, Hefner had some real competition.  Bob Guccione began publishing Penthouse.  A far more lurid (at least to those who set the “proper” sexual standards for middle America) magazine, where full nudity reigned supreme.  Which, of course, meant that Hef was going to have to compete in a similar fashion.

And, there were other games as well.  To the best of my recollection, there were letters both contiguous to and inside the P of Playboy.  Which supposedly connoted the sexual encounters for the various ladies depicted within.  Who knows?  Actually, who cares…

70s Playboy MagazineBut besides the unknowns, the women dying to have their instance of fame, many celebrities graced the pages of Playboy.  From Marilyn Monroe (who didn’t really pose for the magazine) and Jayne Mansfield (who did) to  Kim Basinger, from Bo Derek to Drew Barrymore.  And, Lindsay Lohan, Farrah Fawcett, Madonna, Daryll Hannah, Sharon Stone, Denise Richards, Katarina Witt, Ursula Andress, Pamela Anderson, Raquel Welch… and, of course, Kim Kardashian.   But over 62+ years, there were a slew of folks- including many young ones from the colleges around the US.  Back when the monthly circulation was around 7 million.

But, now with soft (and hard) porn on TV’s cable channels (the soft stuff is visiting many a broadcast network, too), Playboy has fallen on hard times.  Circulation now is down to about 800,000!

(By the way, a secret that most feminists don’t want to divulge.  Cable porn is vastly different from the sort that found its way to “artsy” theaters of the 70s, 80s, and 90s.  It is now aimed at women.  I guess some folks can’t get enough “romance” in their romance novels- or feel left out of the ‘fifty shades’…)

But, don’t worry.  Now, nudity has left the station.  No more will it grace he pages of Playboy.  Nope.  There’ll be more nudity in the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit issue or those lurid Victoria Secret catalogues that bombard our homes.

Mar 16 Playboy

Oh, and Rachel Maddow (of MSNBC fame) will be both depicted and interviewed in next month’s issue.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter
Share

4 thoughts on “No more brown bagging it…”

  1. I have a full box of Vintage Playboy magazines I “inherited” (at my request) from my grandfather’s collection. The fiction is better than the articles, and the roster of well-known authors published there is impressive. I’m a feminist; I would not have minded being published in Playboy.

    I haven’t watched cable porn, but judging by the titles I see in the listings, I cannot imagine this garbage is aimed at (or, if it is, is successfully targeting) women. It is crass and just the titles embarrass me. And I’m no prude.

    I think where they all went wrong started in the late 1970s. There’s a line over which, once crossed, the human body begins to go from “titillating” to merely…tits. And from there, it becomes about as arousing as a piece of packaged hamburger. Or a clinical illustration of body parts in a doctor’s office (I’m with you there – might as well label them and explain how they work, once you get to that point – it’s more useful information, eh?). You would have to turn a person inside out to get at anything that hasn’t already been photographed quite clearly a thousand times before – there’s nothing left to shock and tickle the imagination.

    It may be time for this particular era to end, or to reinvent itself. Perhaps the classier and more modest models will be the ones to arouse desire and fuel the fantasies – maybe in the next decade, the real fantasy will be a homecooked meal and a good night’s sleep.
    Holly Jahangiri recently posted..A Touch of Early Spring

    1. I’m glad someone read the interviews. The issue I recall was with Norman Mailer’s…
      Your choices in TExas must be vastly different than what they offer here in the East, Holly. And, the statistics are from teh cable industry… who clearly know who is buying what…(Like the porn publisher of 50 Shades, I might add..)
      I agree that Guccionne and Larry Flynt changed the way those magazines presented their pictures.

Comments are closed.