Can you hear those snickers? The gutting of Dodd-Frank

No Gravatar

Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC)

I guess the Great Recession is fading from memory. Not only has no one really been prosecuted for destroying the American economy, but we are chipping (with a jackhammer) away at the regulations that were passed to insure the banks never again ruin our economy.

It’s one of the reasons why the Republicans (with the complicity of the Democrats) inserted language written by and demanded by Citicorp in the “Cromnibus” bill that passed in December to afford the US it’s first whole years’ budget in a while. The provision lets banks (almost all banks rely upon federal insurance) deal with derivatives and swaps- just the sort of things that got us into the recession (plus those mortgage deals that sliced and diced “iffy” ones to convince folks to buy the bonds getting the mortgages off the banks balance sheets and onto the investors’ liabilities).

And, now US District Court Judge John Bates rules that the SEC should not compel companies to disclose all payments they make to sovereign countries. This suit was brought by the American Petroleum Institute, the quasi-lobbying/technical agent for the US petroleum firms.

Dodd-Frank regulations stipulated that oil/gas/mining firms had to disclose payments that exceed $ 100,000 in aggregate to foreign countries. What are these payments? Generally, they are inducements (um, ‘bribes’) to foreign countries and their rulers to afford these companies the rights for natural resource (oil, gas, and mineral) extraction- mining and refining.

Now, these bribes won’t see the light of day.

And, we all know how well we’ve been seeing the true payroll ratios for executives at public companies. Because no one has been enforcing the rule that requires companies to disclose the ratios of their top management pay to that of their average employees’. (But, we can discern (years later) that many [most] executive are being paid about 250 or more times the rate of their average employees.)

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter
Share

6 thoughts on “Can you hear those snickers? The gutting of Dodd-Frank”

  1. Your posts are quite cerebral. It’s going to take a minute to process in my ‘Monday Brain’. I think there are those who will continue to ‘get away’ with what they’ve been doing for many years and there will be those who are selected as ‘scapegoats’ to show that all are supposedly being handled appropriately. Perhaps it’s because I have very little faith in the government that I actually believe that these laws will be enforced.
    Mary Burris recently posted..80’s Music: The Jets

    1. Ah, Mary. So sorry. Yes, they are- hence the name cerebrations.
      I haven’t seen many scapegoats in this fiasco- but it is certainly clear that the politicians (who receive their political funds from these guys- we don’t seem to want to call them bribes) are adjusting the laws to let them keep taking the rest of us over the cliff…. again.

  2. A controversial topic. I think that we need more transparency, but not at any costs: for instance, I don’t think that we need the pay of the top execs, just an aggregate. Otherwise it can easily be used purely to satisfy the curiosity…
    Muriel recently posted..A Time To Regroup

    1. Oh, we certainly need the RATIO of the compensation of the executives to that of their average worker. That is what the regulations stipulate. Too many executives attribute the success of their organization to themselves- and any failure to so achieve to their recalcitrant employees. And, still pay themselves ridiculously engorged salaries- at all times.

Comments are closed.