A New Immunity?

No Gravatar

One of the amazing things about science is that what we thought we knew was right is often wrong.  I know that can be disappointing,  but to me it’s pretty exhilarating.

English: Flow diagram showing a summary of inn...
English: Flow diagram showing a summary of innate immune system (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

I can recall reading my dad’s chemistry, biology, and physics texts, when I was a tyke. And, was amazed at how wrong they were.  (Don’t even get me started on his history books that described the World War (there wasn’t a second one, yet.)

I recall much of what I learned in college and grad school is no longer complete- or may even be off-track.  Which is one of the major reasons why we need to keep current in our fields. If we don’t, we simply just don’t know enough to be useful.

That’s exactly what’s happening in immunology.  What I was teaching even 6 years ago is, now, at best. only part of the picture. I taught that our bodies resisted infection via two pathways.  One- outside the cells- produces antibodies that attack the invaders.  (This is called the ‘adaptive immune system’.)  And, inside the cells (the ‘innate immune system’), a non-specific system, attacks all invaders- but leaves no long-term defenses against a specific invader for the next attack.   However, we are now seeing that antibodies don’t just work outside the cells, but combat viruses from within the cells.

Dr. L. James and W. McEwan and their team at the Laboratory of Molecular Biology (Cambridge, England) [the original article is no longer available; this explains that article.- 2022 update] have determined that adenoviri (the culprits behind the common cold) are attacked within the cell by antibodies.   And, one of the key components is something they called TRIM21.  It seems that TRIM21 manages to dispose of the virus- and it also sounds an alarm to the rest of the cell that the cell is under attack.

Now that Drs. James and McEwan have fought their crusade (many journals refused to accept their findings- and their publications- since it was contrary to “popular” opinion; that seems no longer to be the case with this new citation in Nature.), it is hoped that we can use their revolutionary discovery to develop new modalities to attack viral infections.  After all, this modality means that vaccinations are no longer the only way to go- there may be a specific molecule we can develop, akin to antibiotic actions against bacterial infections, to help our bodies against attack.

This new molecule, TRIM21 is found in the ribonucleoprotein RoSSA (comprised of a polypeptide attached to one of four potential RNA molecules).  RoSSA is the critical agent in Sjogren’s Syndrome and Lupus.  So, now, maybe we can also determine why our bodies decide to attack themselves, just as they do with these diseases.

Enhanced by Zemanta
Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter
Share

6 thoughts on “A New Immunity?”

  1. I am always interested is watching how medical science changes but question why when something new runs against popular opinion, it can take years to get the research grants needed to advance it. I guess the medical field is just too large to help everyone. I am always amazed at the research and development that comes from the Medical school of Wisconsin in Madison. I guess they have the funding?
    Chef William recently posted..Peppers or Chilies

  2. This is wonderful information for auto-immune, but also in cancer research as well since they are working toward using the immune system to fight the cancer. Science is fascinating to me, like learning to read the universe from the smallest cells to the largest systems. It’s amazing how far we’ve come and boggling to think how far we have to go. Great post! Very neat information.
    Lisa recently posted..Novae Prime by Lisa Brandel

    1. Yes, this is, Lisa.
      I think the goal is to find some immunity builders for the autoimmune diseases and a few recalcitrant viral infections, first.
      But, whatever it does, it makes us think in different ways!

  3. It seems that the more we thought were facts until we learn that wasn’t true the further along we can go. This is why I get so chapped when people teach certain scientific theories as facts to kids in schools. Why go to the trouble of testing facts? Theories, on the other hand, are great for testing.
    Ann Mullen recently posted..Senior Care: Insomnia

    1. Now, now, Ann! Let us not forget that we thought atoms were like billiard balls, because we could not see the tiny things inside. The same, to a large degree, is involved in this case.
      There is a difference between asserting we now all we need to know and providing an explanation for the things we do…

Comments are closed.